![]() ![]() On the complainant and his uncleĪbdul Hameed were standing near their houses at their lands, when at 7.00 P.M. Therein that there exists dispute over matrimonial affairs between Khushal KhanĪnd uncle of complainant namely Abdul Hameed Mahesar. The prosecution case are that complainant Nishad Ali lodged FIR alleging Mohammad were acquitted of the charges by giving them benefit of doubt. By the same judgment accused Shahdad alias However, the accused /Īppellants were extended benefit of Section 382-B Cr. Heirs of deceased Abdul Hameed Mahesar and in case of non-payment ofĬompensation amount, to undergo S.I. (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each under section 544-A Cr. ![]() for 25 years and to pay fine of Rs.50,000/. Gambat, whereby he convicted the appellants Khan and others), being outcome of Crime No.85/2009 registered at P.S. Judge, Gambat in Sessions Case No.308 of 2009 (Re-State Vs. Saleem Jessar, J.- Through this Criminal Appeal appellants haveĬhallenged Judgment dated handed down by learned Additional Sessions IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, BENCH AT SUKKURĪppellants Khshal Khan : through Mr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |